NetSecLaw: Dedicated to events, news and trends in technology law. XML Feed

30.3.05

Supreme Court Weighs in on MGM V Grokster from Clyde

22.3.05

Cyberlaw in the Supreme Court - Stanford Law School Center for Internet and Society April 30th @ SLS

"On March 29, 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear arguments in two cases that together will greatly determine how government can and will regulate the Internet in the future, and the impact that the public interest will have on the development of cyberlaw over the next decade.

In MGM v. Grokster, the Court will decide whether copyright holders can veto consumer electronics and computing innovations that upset the content industries' prevailing business models, even where the technology's non-infringing uses provide substantial benefits to consumers. The question is whether consumer demand for new and better products will drive technological development, or copyright owners' demand for control will retard it.

In Brand X v. FCC, the Court will decide whether the FCC should retain the option to regulate cable modem services to promote open access to broadband lines, universal service and network neutrality, as it did in the early days of the Internet when most people connected over common-carrier telephone lines. The question is whether tomorrow's communications services will be defined by citizen choices or by the business interests of a handful of cable broadband companies.

At Cyberlaw in the Supreme Court, the Stanford Law School Center for Internet and Society will convene a discussion of these cases, their broader implications, and what effect the pending Supreme Court decisions could have on the public interest. Panels of attorneys litigating and arguing these cases, the parties affected by them, the policy advocates whose work will begin once the Judges rule, and the people thinking about what the legal landscape will look like for the next ten years will discuss both cases and the impact the decisions will have on the future.

Featuring: Jillian Ann, artist/singer; John Perry Barlow, EFF*; Hank Berry*; Jim Burger, Counsel for Amicus Intel; Stacy Canan, AARP Senior Counsel; Dr. Mark Cooper, Consumer Federation of America; Tommy Goldstein, Counsel for Brand X, Stanford Law School; Amy Levine, Rep. Boucher's Office*; Andrew MacBride, Wiley Rein & Fielding*; Andrew McLaughlin, Google; Chris Murray, Vonage; Michael Page, Keker & Van Nest, Counsel for Grokster; Michael Petricone, CEA;* Jim Pickrell, President, Brand X Internet; Paul Saffo, Institute for the Future*; Gigi Sohn, Public Knowledge; Barry Steinhardt, ACLU*; Gabe Zichermann, VP, Trymedia Systems

*unconfirmed

For more information:

Brand X Case @ cyberlaw.stanford.edu
Grokster Case @ eff.org

16.3.05

Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace by Lawrence Lessig is going into a second edition which will be edited by the community via wiki technology.

15.3.05

WorldCom's Cowboy Bites the Dust

"Bernie Ebbers, the former boss of WorldCom, has been found guilty in a federal court in New York of a massive fraud, and faces up to 85 years in jail. Prosecutors will hope that this points the way to convictions in other big fraud cases, not least the upcoming Enron trials"

12.3.05

Judge: Apple can pursue fan site sources

British court forces ISPs to reveal music sharers

Slashdot: AIM's New Terms Of Service

From Australia: Central Coast man faces extradition to US

8.3.05

Arizona student guilty of Web piracy

4.3.05

This could prove to be interesting as it shakes out.

Tentative ruling favors Apple in blog case

3.3.05

Peer to Peer Showdown from Clyde

Judge dismisses spam conviction

2.3.05

Anti-Phishing Act of 2005 Introduced by Sen. Patrick Leahy (VT)